Work
Share this article
Most organisations chase engagement through perks and surveys. The smartest ones are building it through purpose.
Telus recently expanded its employee volunteer initiative, allowing staff to contribute time during work hours to causes they care about. On paper, it looks like a nice corporate responsibility gesture. Dig deeper, and you find something more interesting: a company betting that meaningful work outside the job description might be the key to engagement inside it. They are not alone in this bet. But the question worth asking is whether the rest of us are paying attention to what the data actually says about purpose, connection, and why people stay.
The Engagement Problem Nobody Has Solved
Let us start with an uncomfortable truth. Despite decades of focus on employee engagement, most organisations have not cracked it. Gallup's State of the Global Workplace report consistently shows that roughly 77% of employees worldwide are not engaged at work. Some are actively disengaged. Most are simply showing up, doing the minimum, and mentally checking out the moment the clock hits five.
HR teams have thrown everything at this problem. Ping pong tables. Flexible hours. Unlimited vacation policies that nobody actually uses. Wellness stipends. The results have been mixed at best. Engagement scores inch up after a new initiative launches, then drift back to baseline within months. It is not that these interventions are bad. They are simply insufficient. They treat symptoms without addressing the underlying condition.
The underlying condition is this: most people do not feel like their work matters. Not in a cosmic sense, though that plays a role too. In a daily, practical sense. They complete tasks. They attend meetings. They hit metrics. But the connection between what they do and something larger than themselves remains invisible. This is where volunteering enters the conversation, not as a feel-good afterthought, but as a serious engagement lever.
What Telus Understood About Purpose
Telus did not stumble into volunteer programming by accident. The Canadian telecommunications company has been building this infrastructure for years, gradually expanding the scope of what employees can contribute and when. The latest expansion allows more staff to participate during working hours, removing one of the biggest barriers to corporate volunteering: time.
Time is the honest currency. Companies that ask employees to volunteer after hours are really asking them to sacrifice family dinners, exercise routines, and rest. Some employees will do it anyway, driven by personal values. Most will not. By making volunteering something that happens within the workday, Telus signals that this matters enough to pay for it. That signal carries weight.
But here is what gets overlooked in most coverage of programs like this. The benefit is not primarily to the community, though communities certainly benefit. The benefit is to workplace culture itself. When people do meaningful work together, something shifts. They see each other differently. They talk about things beyond deadlines and deliverables. They build the kind of trust that no team-building exercise can manufacture.
The Psychology Behind Prosocial Behaviour at Work
The American Psychological Association has explored the connection between prosocial behaviour and well-being extensively. The findings are consistent: helping others activates neural pathways associated with reward and satisfaction. This is not speculation. It is neuroimaging data. When people engage in acts of kindness and service, their brains respond in ways measurably similar to receiving rewards themselves.
This has implications for performance management that most organisations have not fully absorbed. Traditional performance frameworks focus on individual output, competitive rankings, and achievement of personal targets. These systems are not wrong, exactly. They capture part of what drives human motivation. But they miss the collaborative, purpose-driven part. They miss the fact that people are social creatures who derive meaning from contribution.
When volunteering becomes part of the performance conversation, something interesting happens. Employees start seeing recognition not just as praise for hitting numbers, but as acknowledgment of their broader impact. They start understanding their role in the organisation as connected to something beyond quarterly results. This is not soft thinking. It is strategic alignment of incentives with what actually motivates humans.
Pulse Surveys Are Telling You Something You Might Be Ignoring
If your organisation runs pulse surveys with any regularity, you have data on employee sentiments. Probably a lot of it. The question is whether you are reading it correctly. Most pulse surveys include questions about purpose, meaning, and connection to company mission. Most organisations see middling scores on these questions and shrug. They focus instead on the tactical stuff: satisfaction with management, comfort with workload, clarity of goals.
This is a mistake. The purpose questions are not filler. They are diagnostic. When employees report feeling disconnected from organisational mission, they are telling you something specific. They are saying that the story you tell about why the company exists is not landing. Or worse, they are saying the story is landing but their daily work does not match it.
Volunteering programs address this gap directly. They create moments where employees experience the company living its values, not just stating them. Employee feedback after volunteer events consistently reflects this. People report feeling prouder of where they work. They describe colleagues differently. They use words like community and team with genuine conviction rather than corporate reflex.
The savvy organisation uses continuous feedback loops to track these shifts. Not annual surveys that arrive too late to matter. Real mechanisms for capturing how employees feel week to week, month to month. When you can see sentiment changing in response to specific initiatives, you can make smarter decisions about where to invest.
Building Action Plans That Actually Work
Here is where most engagement initiatives fail. They generate insights and then do nothing with them. Or they do something, but it is generic, one-size-fits-all, disconnected from what the data actually showed. Effective action plans are specific, tied to identified problems, and measured against clear outcomes.
If your surveys show that employees feel disconnected from purpose, your action plan should address purpose. Not satisfaction with snacks. Purpose. That might mean launching or expanding a volunteering program. It might mean restructuring how you communicate company impact. It might mean changing how managers talk about the meaning behind day-to-day tasks. Probably all three.
McKinsey's research on organisational performance emphasises that the companies seeing real engagement gains are those treating it as an ongoing discipline, not a project. They are not running engagement initiatives. They are building engagement systems. Volunteering fits into this as one component of a larger architecture that connects individual contribution to collective purpose.
"When volunteering becomes part of the performance conversation, employees start seeing recognition not just as praise for hitting numbers, but as acknowledgment of their broader impact."
The shift from transactional to meaningful work
The Role of Communication Tools in Scaling Impact
One reason volunteering programs often stay small is logistics. Coordinating hundreds or thousands of employees across locations, matching them to causes, tracking participation, celebrating outcomes. It is genuinely complicated. This is where communication tools become critical infrastructure, not just nice-to-haves.
Organisations with mature volunteering programs use platforms that make participation easy. Employees can see available opportunities, sign up without friction, log their hours, and share experiences. Managers can see who is participating and recognise contributions. Leadership can track aggregate impact and communicate it back to the organisation.
But communication tools serve another function that matters just as much. They make the invisible visible. Most work happens in silos. One team does not know what another team is doing. When volunteering activities are shared across the organisation, they create common ground. They generate stories people can rally around. They build shared identity in ways that corporate announcements simply cannot.
Real time analytics take this further. When leadership can see participation data updating live, they can respond in the moment. They can recognise individuals and teams promptly rather than waiting for quarterly reviews. They can spot patterns in who is participating and who is not, then investigate why. Speed matters in engagement. Delayed recognition is diluted recognition.
Why Company Culture Cannot Be Mandated
There is a temptation to treat culture as something leadership can dictate. Write the values on the wall. Repeat them in all-hands meetings. Include them in the employee handbook. Done. Except it does not work that way. Culture is not what you say. It is what happens. It is the accumulated result of thousands of small decisions, interactions, and priorities playing out across the organisation every day.
Volunteering programs affect culture precisely because they change what happens. They create new contexts for interaction. They generate shared experiences. They demonstrate values in action rather than in PowerPoint. When employees build a house together for a family in need, or pack meals for a food bank, or mentor students from disadvantaged backgrounds, they are not hearing about the company's values. They are living them.
This is harder to measure than satisfaction scores, which is why many organisations underweight it. But Harvard Business Review has published extensively on the business case for culture investment. The returns show up in retention, in discretionary effort, in how people talk about the company when leadership is not in the room. They show up in whether talented people join and whether they stay.
The Recognition Problem Nobody Talks About
Most organisations are bad at recognition. Not because they do not try, but because they try in narrow ways. The typical recognition program celebrates sales results, project completions, and tenure milestones. These are fine things to celebrate. But they represent a sliver of what people actually contribute.
What about the employee who mentors three colleagues informally? The one who stays positive through difficult periods and lifts team morale? The one who volunteers personal time for community causes the company claims to care about? If these contributions go unrecognised, the message is clear: we say we value these things, but we do not actually notice them.
Sophisticated recognition systems capture broader contributions. They create space for peer recognition, not just top-down acknowledgment. They connect recognition to values, making explicit the link between what someone did and why it matters. When volunteering is recognised formally, it signals that the organisation sees the whole person, not just their job function.
This matters more than many HR teams realise. Gartner research on talent trends consistently shows that employees want to be seen as complete individuals, not interchangeable resources. They want to bring their values to work, not check them at the door. Recognition systems that acknowledge volunteering and community contribution address this need directly.
What European Organisations Can Learn
Eurostat data shows interesting patterns in European workforce engagement. While participation rates vary significantly by country, the relationship between purpose and retention holds across borders. Employees who report feeling connected to meaningful work are less likely to leave. This is true in Germany, in Spain, in the Netherlands, everywhere the data has been collected.
European organisations face some distinct challenges. Labour markets differ. Cultural attitudes toward corporate social responsibility vary. What works in North America does not automatically translate. But the underlying psychology is universal. People want meaning. They want connection. They want to know their time counts for something beyond a paycheck.
The organisations getting this right in Europe are adapting models, not copying them. They are considering local contexts, partnering with community organisations that resonate culturally, giving employees agency in choosing causes. The principle transfers even when the tactics must change.
Making This Work in Practice
Theory is easy. Implementation is where things get difficult. If you are considering launching or expanding a volunteer initiative, here is what the evidence suggests about what actually works.
First, executive sponsorship matters enormously. Not in the performative sense of a CEO sending an email. In the substantive sense of leaders participating themselves, prioritising the initiative in resource allocation, and holding middle managers accountable for supporting participation. Without this, volunteer programs become side projects that wither when business pressure increases.
Second, choice matters. Mandatory volunteering is an oxymoron. Employees need to opt in genuinely, and they need options that align with their personal values. Some people care deeply about education. Others about environmental conservation. Others about hunger and homelessness. A good program offers variety and lets employees gravitate toward what moves them.
Third, integration matters. Volunteering should not be separate from everything else happening in the organisation. It should connect to the engagement platform, the recognition system, the performance conversation. When these elements are siloed, employees experience them as disconnected initiatives. When they are integrated, employees experience them as a coherent culture.
Fourth, measurement matters, but not in the way most organisations think. The goal is not to turn volunteering into another metric employees game. The goal is to understand impact, both on communities served and on employee sentiment. This requires sophisticated thinking about what to measure and what to leave unmeasured.
"Culture is not what you say. It is what happens. It is the accumulated result of thousands of small decisions, interactions, and priorities playing out across the organisation every day."
The truth about workplace culture
The Continuous Feedback Loop
Effective volunteering programs evolve. They respond to what employees actually want, not what leadership assumes they want. This requires building feedback mechanisms into the program from the start.
After each volunteering event, capture employee feedback. Not lengthy surveys. Quick pulse checks. What worked? What did not? Would you do this again? What would make it better? Aggregate this feedback, look for patterns, adjust accordingly. The same continuous feedback principles that apply to engagement broadly apply here specifically.
Some organisations go further, creating employee councils that help shape the volunteering program itself. This serves two purposes. It ensures the program reflects genuine employee interest rather than top-down assumptions. And it creates additional engagement through participation in program design. People support what they help build.
The Business Case You Can Actually Make
If you need to make the case for volunteering investment to sceptical leadership, do not lead with feel-good arguments. Lead with business outcomes.
Retention costs are concrete. Replacing an employee typically costs between 50% and 200% of their annual salary, depending on role complexity. If volunteering programs improve retention even marginally, the financial case builds quickly. Run the numbers for your organisation. Show leadership what a five percentage point improvement in retention would mean in real dollars.
Employer brand is concrete. In competitive talent markets, reputation matters. Candidates research organisations before applying. They read reviews on Glassdoor and Indeed. They ask current employees what the culture is really like. A visible commitment to community engagement affects these conversations. It helps attract people whose values align with the organisation.
Engagement scores are concrete. They correlate with productivity, customer satisfaction, and profitability. Gallup has quantified these relationships extensively. If volunteering programs improve engagement scores, they improve downstream outcomes. This is measurable, trackable, reportable to the board.
Where Most Organisations Go Wrong
Knowing what to do is half the challenge. Avoiding common mistakes is the other half. Here are the patterns that undermine volunteering programs most often.
Treating it as marketing. When volunteering becomes primarily about generating social media content and press releases, employees notice. Authenticity matters. The focus should be on impact, not optics. Yes, you can communicate what you are doing. But the doing should come first, and the communication should serve the program rather than the other way around.
Abandoning it when times get tough. Economic downturns pressure organisations to cut anything that looks discretionary. Volunteering programs often land on the chopping block early. This sends exactly the wrong signal at exactly the wrong time. When employees are anxious about layoffs and uncertain about the future, eliminating the programs that provide meaning and connection makes everything worse.
Failing to connect it to strategy. Volunteering should align with organisational purpose and values. Random acts of charity are fine, but they miss the opportunity for strategic impact. If you are a healthcare company, partnering with health-focused nonprofits makes sense. If you are a technology company, supporting digital literacy programs makes sense. This alignment reinforces rather than dilutes organisational identity.
The Long View
Engagement is not a problem you solve once. It is a condition you maintain indefinitely. Like physical fitness, it requires ongoing effort, adaptation to changing circumstances, and attention to what the data tells you.
Volunteering programs fit into this long view. They are not quick fixes. They are infrastructure for sustained engagement. They create recurring opportunities for employees to connect with purpose, with each other, and with communities beyond the workplace. Over time, these experiences accumulate. They shape how employees think about their relationship with the organisation.
The organisations winning the engagement game in 2025 and beyond will be those that understand this. They will stop chasing silver bullets. They will start building systems. They will recognise that engagement comes from meaning, and meaning comes from contribution, and contribution requires opportunity.
Telus understood something when they expanded their volunteering initiative. They understood that giving employees time to contribute to causes they care about is not a cost. It is an investment. The returns show up in loyalty, in discretionary effort, in how people talk about the company when no one from corporate is listening. Those returns compound over time.
The question for every other organisation is simple. Are you making the same investment? And if not, why not?
Ready to build an engagement system that actually works?
Kodecrew helps organisations connect recognition, feedback, and culture in one platform.
Explore Kodecrew
